Insurers are aware of new potential risks, but design liability policies aren't being changed.

Image by AdobeStock
Potential AI insurance exclusions were a hot topic on law and business websites this past year.
A ll through the last year, business media covering insurance and law have described insurers' preparations for inserting new generative artificial intelligence exclusions into business policies. Thousands of words have been devoted to the subject so far.
But no such exclusions have been incorporated into policies for designers and contractors and aren't expected to be any time soon, according to insurers and brokers of design professional and contractor professional liability policies.
"We are constantly evaluating the landscape and we don’t want to have a blanket policy, so the short answer is we are not applying AI exclusions," says Michelle Chia, insurer AXA XL's chief underwriting officer in the Americas for cyber, design and select professions.
Several insurers, including AXA XL, do offer protection under separate cyber policies for some misuses of AI. And although a few insurers declined to comment for this article, there's no sign that any have employed a generative AI exclusion for design professionals or contractors that perform design tasks.
What is clear is that insurers are convinced that generative AI, now incorporated into different aspects of design and construction work, could pose new and still unmeasurable exposures.
A milestone was passed in January when the Insurance Services Office, which creates model language for policies, issued an AI exclusion.
In an alert posted on its website earlier this year, broker Arthur J. Gallagher wrote that the exclusion is "beginning to appear on commercial general liability (CGL) policies" and "removes coverage" for generative AI used in "tools that are increasingly embedded in routine construction activities."
"This endorsement may create coverage gaps that aren't immediately obvious," Gallagher noted. "These gaps can affect claim outcomes, contractual compliance, bid responsiveness and prequalification with owners and public entities" for injuries or property damage.
Looking for quick answers on construction and engineering topics?
Try Ask ENR, our new smart AI search tool.
Ask ENR →
Still other sources warned that dedicated AI coverages may soon become the norm, with "silent" AI coverage being replaced by specific new insurance products and endorsements with separate fees and payout limits.
One example cited was an absolute AI exclusion for policies issued to cover directors and officers errors and omissions by one of the many Berkley Insurance Co. subsidiaries and operating units.
But that isolated Berkley policy has not been employed in any policy affecting design and construction.
Like broker Gallagher, law firm Shumaker sees a big change coming. It estimates in a website article that silent AI coverage—which may cover an AI-related data breach under a separate cyber policy or a claim related to the improper use of AI-generated content under a technology errors and omissions policy—will gradually become a thing of the past.
The reason? "AI can turn ordinary risks into larger, faster, harder-to-measure risks," Shumaker wrote.
Meanwhile, common sense needs to be applied when using generative AI, says AXA XL's Chia.
Will Claims by Contractors on Big Design-Build Projects Ever Stop?
Designers and contractors need to train staff for proper use of AI that complies with all of a company's rules. Generative AI should be used for appropriate tasks, says Chia, just as you "wouldn't use a Toyota Camry to plow snow."
But when it comes to professional liability insurance, says Chia, "our policy forms for architects and engineers are agnostic as to how the matter occurs."
Deputy Editor Richard Korman helps run ENR's business and legal news and investigations, selects ENR's commentary and oversees editorial content on ENR.com. In 2023 the American Society of Business Publication Editors awarded Richard the Stephen Barr Award, the highest honor for a single feature story or investigation, for his story on the aftermath of a terrible auto crash in Kentucky in 2019, and in 2015 the American Business Media awarded him the Timothy White Award for investigations of surety fraud and workplace bullying. A member of Investigative Reporters and Editors, Richard has been a fellow on drone safety with the McGraw Center for Business Journalism at the Craig Newmark Graduate School of Journalism at CUNY. Richard's freelance writing has appeared in the Seattle Times, the New York Times, Business Week and the websites of The Atlantic and Salon.com. He admires construction projects that finish on time and budget, compensate all team members fairly and record zero fatalities or serious injuries.
| # | Наименование новости | Тональность | Информативность | Дата публикации |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | De-Risking the Workforce Gap: Can AI and Robotics Fill Immediate Need? | 0 | 11.14 | 08-10-2026 |
| 2 | Los riesgos de la inteligencia artificial | 0 | 10 | 15-09-2026 |
| 3 | Nvidia turns to insurers to spread the risk of AI build-out | 0 | 9.11 | 29-09-2026 |
| 4 | NAIC Expands Insurer AI Evaluation Pilot To Machine Learning | 0 | 6.48 | 17-09-2026 |
| 5 | Los riesgos de la inteligencia artificial | 0 | 10 | 15-09-2026 |
| 6 | Повреждение дома беспилотником может оказаться не страховым случаем | 0 | 12.22 | 28-09-2026 |
| 7 | The Real Existential Risk Is AI Company CEOs, AI Researcher Timnit Gebru Says | 0 | 8.71 | 01-10-2026 |
| 8 | Court Evaluates AI-Related Provisions in Discovery Protective Orders | 0 | 22.5 | 06-10-2026 |
| 9 | Gartner: Deploy sandboxes to rein in AI agents | 0 | 7.35 | 26-08-2026 |
| 10 | Riesgos inminentes de la IA | 0 | 10 | 03-10-2026 |