Вход на сайт

Просмотр новости

Найдите то, что Вас интересует

Global Environmental Governance and Rights of Nature Discourses in an Age of Deglobalisation: People, Planet, and Power

Дата публикации: 04-06-2026 00:00:00

This paper discusses the gradual but growing convergence of global environmental governance (GEG) with ideational innovations, specifically focusing on the Rights of Nature (RoN) discourses. The first, uncontroversial claim is that the 20th and early 21st century regime of GEG has failed to resolve the most significant environmental crises of our times. Second, deglobalisation as a period of heightened political contestation and counter-current thinking is also marked by increasing awareness and recognition of non-human actors. This context of continuity and change enables the emergence of conceptual and legal innovations such as the RoN that go beyond anthropocentric and growth-focused conceptualisations of sustainability. Third, although the content of these discourses is not uniform across the world, all variations of the RoN speak to the subjectivity and agency of nature while also invoking legal rights as effective tools for resisting domination by extractive elites and institutional power. The analysis of the impact of RoN discourses on GEG draws on Ranajit Guha’s theoretical framework of dominance and hegemony as contingent relations of power. The original framework is developed further to incorporate nature as a new actor alongside suppressed groups who now have greater visibility and influence in an age of pluralism and polycentricity. This analytical lens sheds light on the complexity and fluidity of indeterminate relationships of domination and resistance among elites, subalterns, and nature. Following from this, the fourth claim is that the impact of these discourses on environmental governance is more likely to be meliorative rather than radical. RoN discourses provide a basis for correctives to norms and policies, as well as checks on power instead of creating a new type of global environmental regime. The emergent interconnections between GEG and RoN discourses are thus interpreted as ideational innovation ‘writ small’, though not as ‘rendered ineffective.’

Основное содержимое страницы с новостью.

A required part of this site couldn’t load. This may be due to a browser extension, network issues, or browser settings. Please check your connection, disable any ad blockers, or try using a different browser.

Схожие новости

#Наименование новостиТональностьИнформативностьДата публикации
1Digital (Global) Capitalism and Re-Globalization07.5216-02-2026
2Trump's Tariff Offensive and the Rise of Strategic Regionalism: Toward Decentralized Globalization07.114-03-2026
3After Globalization: Classical, Hybrid, and Hypermodern Global Governance05.312-06-2026
4Reglobalization: The Role of China08.1815-07-2026
5Permaculture: A subtle yet powerful and radical response to the global ecological crisis?018.2608-09-2026
6Pseudo-Empowerment: State Feminism, Disaster Governance, and its Impact on Lower-Class Women in Indonesia08.6116-02-2026
7There are Democracies in the Landscape07.6730-04-2026
8Confronting the Citizenship’s Sacred Blood Aristocracy Principle: Quality of Nationality Discrepancies as a Factor Underpinning (Investment) Naturalisations04.7620-02-2026
9Neo-Ethnicisation of Citizenship: The EU’s Internal and External Governance of Citizenship by Investment06.7330-05-2026
10Le droit, infrastructure stratégique des entreprises019.3407-09-2026

Классификация: . Схожих патентов: 0. Схожих новостей: 10. Тональность: 0. Информативность: 6.46. Источник: rd.springer.com.