Вход на сайт

Просмотр новости

Найдите то, что Вас интересует

This OLED display makes the Galaxy A57 look pale: Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G review

Дата публикации: 06-10-2026 05:06:00


Performance damper. | Does Xiaomi's new Android phone claim the title of battery king of 2026 in our review? The affordable Xiaomi phone with its 8,340 mAh battery also features Gorilla Glass Victus 2, a 6.83-inch CrystalRes AMOLED display and a Snapdragon SoC. However, our tests reveal many surprising weaknesses in this former mid-range highlight. Is it still worth buying?


Основное содержимое страницы с новостью.

The Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G leaves an extremely mixed impression in our test. With this year’s Pro model at the latest, Xiaomi has broken with the tradition of positioning the Redmi Note series as a balanced all-rounder with a strong price-performance ratio. Instead, the 2026 model moves further towards being an attractive outdoor companion, thanks to its high durability, including IP69K certification, numerous TÜV and SGS certifications, and fantastic battery life. Paired with the very bright AMOLED display, the Xiaomi phone offers strong arguments for outdoor fans.

However, this is offset by clear regressions that become a problem in this price class when looking at the mid-range competition. The cost-cutting on the main camera is hard to comprehend and leads to disappointing results, especially in low light and zoom shots.

Xiaomi also makes a misstep in terms of performance: combined with 6 GB of RAM, the Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 delivers very modest performance that even falls behind the older Note 15 Pro. A Samsung Galaxy A57 or Poco X8 Pro sometimes offers twice the graphics performance for less money.

In addition, the Pro model in the Note series is becoming noticeably heavier year after year. Together with the extensive use of plastic, this is unlikely to inspire much enthusiasm.

Pros

+ bright OLED panel

+ high-frequency PWM dimming

+ robust build quality

+ long update support

+ excellent battery life

Cons

- weak SoC

- downgrade in camera quality

- lots of plastic

- only WiFi 5

- speakers lack depth

The Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G is available in Germany in two storage variants, 6 GB RAM + 256 GB and 8 GB RAM + 512 GB, and three color options, with an RRP starting at around €480. It is available from retailers such as Amazon.de or directly from the manufacturer. However, current street prices, starting at around €350, are significantly lower.

Amazon Logo

  • $779.50

    XIAOMI 17T PRO Ai 5G (Compatible with Tmobile Mint Tello & Global) (512GB + 12GB) NFC Global ROM Unlocked 50MP Triple Pro Leica Cam eSIM 6.83" 144Mhz Model 2602EPTC0G Liberado (Black)

  • $379.50

    XIAOMI Redmi Note 15 Pro+ Plus 5G Ai (Compatible with Tmobile Mint Tello & Global) (512GB + 12GB) NFC 6.83" 120Hz 200MP Ultra Camera Model 2510ERA8BG Unlocked Dual Sim Liberado (Mocha Brown)

  • $399.50

    XIAOMI Redmi Note 15 Pro+ Plus 5G Ai (Compatible with Tmobile Mint Tello & Global) (512GB + 12GB) NFC 6.83" 120Hz 200MP Ultra Camera Model 2510ERA8BG Unlocked Dual Sim Liberado (Glacier Blue)

Table of Contents
  1. Verdict on the Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G
  2. Specifications of the Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G
  3. Case: robust Xiaomi smartphone with IP rating and Gorilla Glass Victus 2
  4. Features: Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G without USB 3.1, but with IR blaster
  5. Software: affordable mid-range smartphone with long updates
  6. Communication and GNSS: Xiaomi smartphone without WiFi 7 and single-band GPS
  7. Phone functions and voice quality: Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G supports dual SIM and eSIM
  8. Cameras: mid-range smartphone with optical image stabilization and 50 megapixels
  9. Accessories and warranty: mid-range smartphone without a charger
  10. Input devices and operation: affordable Android phone with optical fingerprint sensor
  11. Display: Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G OLED screen supports DC dimming and PWM dimming
  12. Performance: Xiaomi smartphone uses Snapdragon chipset and up to 8 GB of RAM
  13. Emissions: Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G only throttles performance slightly under load
  14. Battery life: affordable Android smartphone with silicon-carbon battery and fast charging
  15. Notebookcheck overall assessment
  16. Possible alternatives compared

Processor

Graphics adapter

Memory

6 GB 

, LPDDR4x

Display

6.83 inch 19.5:9, 2772 x 1280 pixel 447 PPI, capacitive Touchscreen, OLED, Gorilla Glass Victus 2, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 

, 224 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity, OTG, Miracast

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B32/​B38/​B40/​B41/​B42/​B48/​B66), 5G (n1/​n2/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n12/​n20/​n26/​n28/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n48/​n66/​n77/​n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.6 x 163.45 x 78.27 ( = 0.34 x 6.44 x 3.08 in)

Battery

8340 mAh Lithium-Ion, 67W wired, PD3.0, silicon-carbon anode

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 16

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8, 26 mm, 1/2.76", PDAF, OIS) + 8 MPix (f/2.2, 15 mm, ultrawide, 1/4.0"), videos 1080p@30fps, camera API: Full
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f/​2.4, Videos @1080p/​30fps)

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, USB cable, info material, case, HyperOS 3.0, 12 Months Warranty, SAR: 0.90W/​kg head, 0.93W/​kg body | Single Band GNSS: GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou (B1I/​B1C), Galileo, QZSS | IP68/IP69K | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM | HDR10, HDR10+, HLG, fanless, waterproof

Released

08/27/2026

Weight

223 g ( = 7.87 oz / 0.49 pounds)

Price

480 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

Redmi Note 17 Pro colors

ⓘ Xiaomi

Redmi Note 17 Pro colors

The Redmi Note 17 Pro shows plenty of light when it comes to the case, but there are some shortcomings in terms of feel. A real highlight is the front, with a very high screen-to-body ratio of almost 90 percent. This means that the bezels are extremely narrow for this price class. Gorilla Glass Victus 2 also protects the display.

On the other hand, Xiaomi uses a lot of plastic in its mid-range phone, which means the back and frame do not feel particularly premium. Owing to the gigantic battery, the case is also fairly thick and heavy.

The durability, however, is convincing. The case offers protection in accordance with IP68 and IP69K. TÜV SÜD also certifies the Redmi Note 17 Pro as water-resistant to a depth of 2 meters for 72 hours. In addition, the Xiaomi phone is SGS-certified and is said to withstand drops from a height of up to 3 meters onto a granite surface. The battery also proves tough: according to Xiaomi, under laboratory conditions it withstood extreme environmental stresses, such as simulated storage and discharge at high and low temperatures ranging from -40 °C to 75 °C.

      Nothing Phone (4a)       Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G       Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G       Samsung Galaxy A57       Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro       DIN A6 ❌

163.9 mm / 6.45 in 77.5 mm / 3.05 in 8.5 mm / 0.3346 in 204.5 g0.4508 lbs163.45 mm / 6.44 in 78.27 mm / 3.08 in 8.6 mm / 0.3386 in 223 g0.4916 lbs163.6 mm / 6.44 in 78.1 mm / 3.07 in 8 mm / 0.315 in 210 g0.463 lbs161.5 mm / 6.36 in 76.8 mm / 3.02 in 6.9 mm / 0.2717 in 179 g0.3946 lbs157.5 mm / 6.2 in 75.2 mm / 2.96 in 8.4 mm / 0.3307 in 202 g0.4453 lbs148 mm / 5.83 in 105 mm / 4.13 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 1.5 g0.00331 lbs

Xiaomi's mid-range phone offers what can be expected for this price class. An electronic compass, NFC, an IR blaster and USB OTG are all on board. However, a fast USB 3 port with the option of outputting an image signal via cable is not provided. Miracast can be used wirelessly. In our test, the Redmi Note 17 Pro achieved a low speed of just under 29 MBit/s with a Samsung Portable SSD T7.

The Redmi Note 17 Pro is set to receive security updates for six years, while Android upgrades are expected up to Android 21. The 2026 model, which ships with Android 16, is not yet listed in the Security Center.

The ads displayed under HyperOS 3 are noticeable.

Xiaomi does not provide any truly reliable information about its ecological footprint. According to the manufacturer, the Redmi phone benefits from Xiaomi’s ESG measures, such as avoiding plastic in packaging, using lower-CO₂ rail and sea transport routes, and the self-repair program. Plastic films are not used for the Note 17 Pro.

Xiaomi’s cost-cutting is evident in the slow WiFi 5 standard and probably also in the antenna equipment, as the Redmi phone only reached a sluggish peak of 350 MBit/s in our measurements. In mobile communications, however, the Note 17 Pro is much better positioned thanks to 5G support and many LTE frequencies.

Networking
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U

362 (min: 347) MBit/s ∼22%

iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U

340 (min: 319) MBit/s ∼19%

Nothing Phone (4a)
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000

949 (min: 930) MBit/s ∼100%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

830 (min: 787) MBit/s ∼100%

Samsung Galaxy A57
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz

994 (min: 958) MBit/s ∼79%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz

919 (min: 778) MBit/s ∼65%

Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000

949 (min: 476) MBit/s ∼100%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

825 (min: 792) MBit/s ∼99%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000

214 (min: 175) MBit/s ∼23%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

364 (min: 246) MBit/s ∼44%

Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000

337 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼36%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

330 (min: 20.1) MBit/s ∼40%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz

309 (min: 287) MBit/s ∼25%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz

315 (min: 291) MBit/s ∼22%

iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U

345 (min: 304) MBit/s ∼21%

iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U

349 (min: 328) MBit/s ∼19%

Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000

656 (min: 52.5) MBit/s ∼69%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

687 (min: 52.2) MBit/s ∼83%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz

1258 (min: 287) MBit/s ∼100%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz

1413 (min: 339) MBit/s ∼100%

iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U

1643 (min: 316) MBit/s ∼100%

iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U

1792 (min: 328) MBit/s ∼100%

Outdoors, the Redmi Note 17 Pro locates the user quickly and accurately to around 3 meters using single-band GNSS and SBAS support. In our practical test, the Xiaomi phone proved precise compared with the Garmin Venu 2. However, minimal deviations from the route were still noticeable. Since these were well within the acceptable range, the mid-range smartphone can be recommended for navigation without hesitation.

The Note 17 Pro supports dual SIM with either two nanoSIMs or an eSIM in combination. Important phone functions such as VoLTE, VoNR and VoWiFi are also supported. Voice quality is good, and voices are easy to understand through the earpiece.

Selfie with the Note 17 ProSelfie with the Note 17 Pro

Redmi fans are in for a bitter disappointment with the main camera of the 2026 model. The fairly large 200 MP sensor of the Note 15 Pro has been replaced by an ISOCELL JN sensor, probably the JN1, that is almost half the size. As a result, the Note 17 Pro captures significantly less light and shows weaknesses above all in difficult lighting conditions. In our test photos taken in the dark, the autofocus also struggles. At least optical image stabilization is included.

Since there is still no telephoto lens, the move to a mini sensor is doubly annoying. Zoom shots on the Note 17 Pro are therefore only possible in poor quality, as the image crop further amplifies the weaknesses of the ISOCELL JN.

The wide-angle camera with only 8 MP is acceptable, but at best average even for the cheapest mid-range segment.

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraLow light5x zoomUltra-wide angle

orginal image

click to load images

ColorChecker

12.4 ∆E

10.2 ∆E

11.9 ∆E

12.8 ∆E

12.7 ∆E

6.5 ∆E

7.8 ∆E

18.1 ∆E

13.6 ∆E

8.8 ∆E

8.9 ∆E

6.4 ∆E

13.5 ∆E

13.1 ∆E

18.7 ∆E

4.3 ∆E

15.4 ∆E

14.8 ∆E

4.8 ∆E

3.8 ∆E

9.9 ∆E

13.8 ∆E

10.3 ∆E

2 ∆E

ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G: 10.61 ∆E min: 2.04 - max: 18.74 ∆E
ColorChecker

29.4 ∆E

53.1 ∆E

39.4 ∆E

34.6 ∆E

44.8 ∆E

60.7 ∆E

51.7 ∆E

34.1 ∆E

41.7 ∆E

28.4 ∆E

63.5 ∆E

62.4 ∆E

29.8 ∆E

47.1 ∆E

36.2 ∆E

74.5 ∆E

42.8 ∆E

41.4 ∆E

88.5 ∆E

70.3 ∆E

52 ∆E

36.9 ∆E

24.4 ∆E

13.9 ∆E

ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G: 45.89 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 88.45 ∆E

Our test device comes with a USB-C cable, a SIM eject tool, a protective case and a warranty card. According to the warranty card, the Note 17 Pro comes with only a 12-month warranty. The 67-watt HyperCharger has to be purchased separately.

Inputs on the large OLED screen are sampled at 240 Hz and are registered without delay. The instant touch sampling rate also increases to 3,200 Hz when Game Turbo mode is activated. The optical fingerprint sensor is positioned quite low on the edge of the display, but unlocks the Redmi phone quickly and reliably. Users can also use insecure 2D facial recognition if desired.

Subpixel arrangementSubpixel arrangement

One highlight of the Xiaomi phone is the sharp AMOLED screen, which operates at up to 120 Hz and gets really bright. In our APL measurement, which is important for everyday use, the Note 17 Pro gets almost twice as bright as a Galaxy A57.

The Redmi smartphone can also beat its Samsung rival when it comes to PWM. We measured PWM flickering at around 120 Hz as well as the high-frequency PWM dimming of up to 3,840 Hz advertised by Xiaomi. We recorded a measured value of 3,571 Hz with a fairly flat amplitude. DC dimming is also available at higher brightness levels.

1062
cd/m²
1048
cd/m²
1065
cd/m²
1068
cd/m²
1053
cd/m²
1070
cd/m²
1072
cd/m²
1056
cd/m²
1069
cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 1072 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1062.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.06 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 1053 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.9 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.69}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.94}
99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.24
CCT: 6747 K

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G
OLED, 2772x1280, 6.8"
Nothing Phone (4a)
AMOLED, 2720x1224, 6.8"
Samsung Galaxy A57
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7"
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro
AMOLED, 2756x1268, 6.6"
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
AMOLED, 2772x1280, 6.8"
Display

-66%

-54%

-19%

-43%

APL18 Peak Brightness (cd/m²)

4034

1455

-64%

1920

-52%

3475

-14%

1953

-52%

HDR Peak Brightness (cd/m²)

4440

1403

-68%

1980

-55%

3406

-23%

2922

-34%

Response Times

-139%

5%

10%

-5%

Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms)

1.6 ?(0.782, 0.8195)

8.18 ?(0.3435, 7.836)

-411%

1.21 ?(0.59, 0.622)

24%

1.11 ?(0.5685, 0.5415)

31%

1.4 ?(0.7, 0.7)

13%

Response Time Black / White * (ms)

1.3 ?(0.667, 0.632)

0.99 ?(0.497, 0.49)

24%

1.1 ?(0.543, 0.5595)

15%

1.05 ?(0.5245, 0.529)

19%

1.4 ?(0.6, 0.8)

-8%

PWM Frequency (Hz)

120

90

240

120

120.5

PWM Amplitude * (%)

13.42

17.49

-30%

16.72

-25%

16.04

-20%

16

-19%

Screen

20%

27%

25%

-1%

Brightness middle (cd/m²)

1053

1536

46%

1135

8%

1104

5%

1155

10%

Brightness (cd/m²)

1063

1538

45%

1134

7%

1102

4%

1136

7%

Brightness Distribution (%)

98

97

-1%

99

1%

97

-1%

97

-1%

Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *

2.9

2.6

10%

1.7

41%

1.2

59%

2.42

17%

Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *

4.9

5.7

-16%

2.5

49%

2.4

51%

5.63

-15%

Greyscale dE 2000 *

3

2

33%

1.4

53%

2.1

30%

3.7

-23%

Gamma

2.24 98%

2.24 98%

2.08 106%

2.22 99%

2.246 98%

CCT

6747 96%

6878 95%

6578 99%

6472 100%

7263 89%

Total Average (Program / Settings)

-62% / -39%

-7% / 6%

5% / 13%

-16% / -10%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz
Amplitude: 13.42 %
Secondary Frequency: 3571 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7611 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Measurement series at a fixed zoom level and different brightness settings (Although the amplitude curve at minimum brightness looks flat, this is due to the scaling. The information box shows an enlarged version of the amplitude at minimum brightness.) 

In our measurements, the Redmi Note 17 lands within the target range for colors (<3), although a look at its Poco sister model shows that Xiaomi is certainly capable of doing better. Slight deviations are visible to the naked eye. Is this annoying in everyday use? Probably not.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.667 ms rise
↘ 0.632 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.7 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.782 ms rise
↘ 0.8195 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.13 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (30.7 ms).

After the camera faux pas, the Redmi Note 17 Pro makes its next misstep with the chipset. Our test device, equipped with 6 GB of RAM, delivers very modest performance in combination with the Snapdragon 6s Gen 4. Even its predecessor is faster than the 2026 model, especially in the AI tests. In Geekbench multi-core, a Poco X8 Pro achieves almost twice as high scores, despite currently being priced more attractively than the Redmi Note 17 Pro.

Geekbench 7.0
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (514 - 4055, n=40, last 2 years)

1585 Points +80%

Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192

1222 Points +39%

Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288

1164 Points +32%

Nothing Phone (4a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288

1107 Points +26%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 6144

881 Points

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4
  (n=1)

881 Points 0%

Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (1368 - 11622, n=40, last 2 years)

5504 Points +110%

Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192

4470 Points +70%

Nothing Phone (4a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288

3323 Points +27%

Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288

2990 Points +14%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 6144

2622 Points

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4
  (n=1)

2622 Points 0%

Geekbench 6.7
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 4733, n=190, last 2 years)

1875 Points +85%

Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288

1564 Points +55%

Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192

1378 Points +36%

Nothing Phone (4a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288

1259 Points +24%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192

1050 Points +4%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4
  (1012 - 1014, n=2)

1013 Points 0%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 6144

1012 Points

Multi-Core
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288

6478 Points +124%

Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 12854, n=190, last 2 years)

5692 Points +96%

Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192

4509 Points +56%

Nothing Phone (4a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288

3393 Points +17%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192

2939 Points +1%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4
  (2898 - 2930, n=2)

2914 Points +1%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 6144

2898 Points

PCMark for Android - Work 3.x
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288

16598 Points +38%

Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192

15108 Points +26%

Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 - 28557, n=133, last 2 years)

15063 Points +26%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192

13662 Points +14%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4
  (11993 - 14722, n=2)

13358 Points +11%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 6144

11993 Points

Antutu v11 - Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (519159 - 4450644, n=45, last 2 years)

2449165 Points +189%

Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288

2004340 Points +136%

Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192

1414040 Points +67%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 6144

848400 Points

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4
  (823021 - 848400, n=2)

835711 Points -1%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288

9423 Points +104%

Average of class Smartphone
  (1885 - 16690, n=113, last 2 years)

8084 Points +75%

Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192

6737 Points +46%

Nothing Phone (4a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288

5610 Points +22%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192

5002 Points +8%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4
  (4611 - 4711, n=2)

4661 Points +1%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 6144

4611 Points

System
Average of class Smartphone
  (4117 - 21153, n=113, last 2 years)

11700 Points +29%

Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288

11003 Points +21%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192

10865 Points +20%

Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192

10270 Points +13%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 6144

9076 Points

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4
  (8570 - 9076, n=2)

8823 Points -3%

Nothing Phone (4a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288

8526 Points -6%

Memory
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288

10367 Points +102%

Average of class Smartphone
  (2760 - 24052, n=113, last 2 years)

9567 Points +86%

Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192

8343 Points +63%

Nothing Phone (4a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288

7679 Points +50%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4
  (5133 - 5807, n=2)

5470 Points +7%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 6144

5133 Points

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192

4953 Points -4%

Graphics
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288

39353 Points +483%

Average of class Smartphone
  (1046 - 61797, n=113, last 2 years)

25230 Points +274%

Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192

13352 Points +98%

Nothing Phone (4a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288

9405 Points +39%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192

8704 Points +29%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4
  (6753 - 6913, n=2)

6833 Points +1%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 6144

6753 Points

Web
Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192

1801 Points +34%

Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288

1785 Points +33%

Average of class Smartphone
  (1062 - 2587, n=113, last 2 years)

1752 Points +30%

Nothing Phone (4a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288

1609 Points +20%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192

1402 Points +4%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4
  (1343 - 1431, n=2)

1387 Points +3%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 6144

1343 Points

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288

51276 Points +546%

Average of class Smartphone
  (2895 - 66164, n=99, last 2 years)

18908 Points +138%

Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192

11868 Points +50%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4
  (7933 - 8777, n=2)

8355 Points +5%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192

8301 Points +5%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 6144

7933 Points

AImark - Score v3.x
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288

29976 Points +5187%

Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 307528, n=67, last 2 years)

13892 Points +2350%

Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192

1030 Points +82%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 6144

567 Points

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4
  (558 - 567, n=2)

563 Points -1%

Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.7
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288

921 Points +587%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192

571 Points +326%

Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 7066, n=134, last 2 years)

543 Points +305%

Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192

284 Points +112%

Nothing Phone (4a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288

247 Points +84%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 6144

134 Points

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4
  (123 - 134, n=2)

128.5 Points -4%

Half Precision NPU 1.7
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288

7194 Points +4761%

Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 35139, n=134, last 2 years)

1450 Points +880%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192

1329 Points +798%

Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192

284 Points +92%

Nothing Phone (4a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288

249 Points +68%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 6144

148 Points

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4
  (122 - 148, n=2)

135 Points -9%

Quantized NPU 1.7
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288

9298 Points +2284%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192

2645 Points +578%

Average of class Smartphone
  (124 - 48271, n=134, last 2 years)

2216 Points +468%

Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192

637 Points +63%

Nothing Phone (4a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288

581 Points +49%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 6144

390 Points

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4
  (346 - 390, n=2)

368 Points -6%

AI Benchmark
Score V5
Average of class Smartphone
  (46.4 - 3334, n=18, last 2 years)

371 Points

Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192

128 Points

Score V6
Average of class Smartphone
  (55.6 - 22780, n=79, last 2 years)

6280 Points +1919%

Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288

4709 Points +1414%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192

540 Points +74%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4
  (311 - 337, n=2)

324 Points +4%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 6144

311 Points

In the GPU tests, the Xiaomi phone with its Adreno 710 performs even worse compared with its predecessor. Even a Galaxy A57 with the Exynos 1680 achieves a hefty 146 percent advantage over the Redmi Note 17 Pro in GFXBench’s 4K test.

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro
Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash

4304 Points +481%

Samsung Galaxy A57
Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

1718 Points +132%

Nothing Phone (4a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

1115 Points +50%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

1012 Points +37%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

741 Points

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro
Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash

4311 Points +479%

Samsung Galaxy A57
Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

1721 Points +131%

Nothing Phone (4a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

1118 Points +50%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

1010 Points +36%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

744 Points

3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro
Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash

703 Points

3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro
Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash

712 Points

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro
Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash

71 fps +407%

Samsung Galaxy A57
Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

43 fps +207%

Nothing Phone (4a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

24 fps +71%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

19 fps +36%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

14 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro
Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash

64 fps +392%

Samsung Galaxy A57
Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

34 fps +162%

Nothing Phone (4a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

21 fps +62%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

17 fps +31%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

13 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro
Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash

111 fps +383%

Samsung Galaxy A57
Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

57 fps +148%

Nothing Phone (4a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

38 fps +65%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

31 fps +35%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

23 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro
Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash

163 fps +329%

Samsung Galaxy A57
Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

72 fps +89%

Nothing Phone (4a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

55 fps +45%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

44 fps +16%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

38 fps

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro
Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash

29 fps +409%

Samsung Galaxy A57
Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

14 fps +146%

Nothing Phone (4a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

9.4 fps +65%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

7.4 fps +30%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

5.7 fps

Jetstream 2
2.0 Total
Samsung Galaxy A57 (Chrome 149)

178.3 Points +49%

Average of class Smartphone (63.9 - 423, n=117, last 2 years)

157.1 Points +32%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G (Chrome 151)

119.362 Points

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (118.3 - 119.4, n=2)

118.8 Points 0%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G (Chrome 144)

112.67 Points -6%

2.2 Total
Average of class Smartphone (2 - 480, n=104, last 2 years)

204 Points +61%

Samsung Galaxy A57 (Chrome 149)

203.905 Points +61%

Nothing Phone (4a) (Chrome 147)

197.209 Points +56%

Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro (Chrome 146)

195.451 Points +55%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (126.5 - 131.3, n=2)

128.9 Points +2%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G (Chrome 151)

126.463 Points

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G (Chrome 144)

122.478 Points -3%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result 2.0
Samsung Galaxy A57 (Chrome 149)

236 runs/min +74%

Average of class Smartphone (49.3 - 733, n=73, last 2 years)

235 runs/min +73%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G (Chrome 151)

136 runs/min

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (113 - 136, n=2)

124.5 runs/min -8%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G (Chrome 144)

123 runs/min -10%

Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0
Samsung Galaxy A57 (Chrome 149)

14.8 runs/min +55%

Average of class Smartphone (3.06 - 45.5, n=81, last 2 years)

14.5 runs/min +52%

Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro (Chrome 146)

13.9 runs/min +45%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G (Chrome 151)

9.56 runs/min

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (7.1 - 9.56, n=2)

8.33 runs/min -13%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G (Chrome 144)

7.49 runs/min -22%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy A57 (Chrome 149)

159 Points +30%

Average of class Smartphone (56 - 278, n=90, last 2 years)

135.5 Points +11%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G (Chrome 151)

122 Points

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (116 - 122, n=2)

119 Points -2%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G (Chrome 144)

112 Points -8%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro (Chrome 146)

62098 Points +59%

Samsung Galaxy A57 (Chrome 149)

55771 Points +43%

Average of class Smartphone (6015 - 126661, n=135, last 2 years)

50757 Points +30%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G (Chrome 151)

39091 Points

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G (Chrome 144)

38676 Points -1%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (34926 - 39091, n=2)

37009 Points -5%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G (Chrome 144)

1072.9 ms * -6%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (1008 - 1093, n=2)

1051 ms * -4%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G (Chrome 151)

1008.1 ms *

Average of class Smartphone (281 - 2718, n=120, last 2 years)

852 ms * +15%

Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro (Chrome 146)

821.9 ms * +18%

Samsung Galaxy A57 (Chrome 149)

776.8 ms * +23%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5GNothing Phone (4a)Samsung Galaxy A57Xiaomi Poco X8 ProXiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5GAverage 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5

1%

-28%

29%

-29%

-4%

18%

Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)

2098.67

2003.93

-5%

1683.07

-20%

3576.86

70%

945

-55%

Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)

1981.23

1596.2

-19%

1119.11

-44%

3565.14

80%

837.4

-58%

Random Read 4KB (MB/s)

266.38

263.22

-1%

249.83

-6%

324.76

22%

184

-31%

Random Write 4KB (MB/s)

251.83

325.75

29%

149.04

-41%

112.05

-56%

326.1

29%

The surface temperatures under sustained load are clearly noticeable, but not really critical. We measured a peak of just under 45 °C. In the 3DMark stress tests, the Redmi Note 17 Pro barely throttles.

44.3 °C
112 F
44 °C
111 F
43 °C
109 F
44.7 °C
112 F
43.7 °C
111 F
42.2 °C
108 F
43.7 °C
111 F
42.6 °C
109 F
40.5 °C
105 F
Maximum: 44.7 °C = 112 F
Average: 43.2 °C = 110 F
42.6 °C
109 F
44.1 °C
111 F
44.4 °C
112 F
42.1 °C
108 F
44.4 °C
112 F
44.4 °C
112 F
41.1 °C
106 F
43.5 °C
110 F
41.8 °C
107 F
Maximum: 44.4 °C = 112 F
Average: 43.2 °C = 110 F

Room Temperature 22 °C = 72 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.7 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.4 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.8 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Nothing Phone (4a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

99.5 % 0%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

99.4 %

Samsung Galaxy A57
Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

90.3 % -9%

Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro
Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash

76.4 % -23%

Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Nothing Phone (4a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

99.7 % +8%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

99.6 % +8%

Samsung Galaxy A57
Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

93.4 % +2%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

92 %

Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro
Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash

74.4 % -19%

01234567891011121314151617Tooltip

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø4.6 (4.26-4.64) %

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø6.01 (6-6.03) %

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø17.5 (17.4-17.5) %

The stereo speakers offer a bass-light sound, but are acceptable for this price class. In the pink noise test, the mids rise, while the highs are also fairly even.

Alternatively, headphones can be connected via USB or wirelessly via Bluetooth. A solid selection of codecs is available.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2028.528.52525.128.73120.929.94031.832503734.36321.721.88019.322.410017.621.812514.730.816015.441.420015.943.925015.250.831514.555.440011.653.35001157.663011.864.980011.172.6100011.971.7125011.375.3160012.276.1200011.477.4250011.974.831501377.1400013.477.5500013.474.4630013.370.9800013.467.61000013.8731250013.373.61600013.764.4SPL24.886.7N0.664.6median 13.3median 70.9Delta1.410.721.224.720.423.424.921.434.729.336.332.920.121.914.13014.535.61641.816.757.315.657.514.756.812.562.69.259.69.966.410.473.81376.812.374.910.577.411.377.311.88212.380.813.37913.574.712.974.513.371.113.167.313.370.213.564.813.261.324.689.10.674.9median 13.1median 71.11.28.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5GSamsung Galaxy A57

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 136%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%

Samsung Galaxy A57 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 136%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%

A distinctive feature of the Redmi Note 17 Pro is its enormous 8,340 mAh battery, which can be charged through the USB-C port at up to 67 watts. In our test using a Xiaomi 2500 power bank, we achieve a charging time of around 65 minutes. Xiaomi's mid-range smartphone does not support wireless charging.

The Redmi Note 17 Pro's power consumption is unremarkable, although its idle consumption of 2 watts leaves room for improvement.

Power Consumption

Off / Standbydarklight 0.17 / 0.31 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.27 / 1.98 / 2.3 Watt
Load midlight 4.62 / 8.73 Watt
 color bar

Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G
8340 mAh
Nothing Phone (4a)
5080 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A57
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro
6500 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
6580 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption

9%

-7%

11%

15%

0%

2%

Idle Minimum * (Watt)

1.27

0.97

24%

0.71

44%

0.97

24%

1.2

6%

1.27 ?(n=1)

-0%

Idle Average * (Watt)

1.98

2.07

-5%

1.94

2%

1.19

40%

1.5

24%

1.98 ?(n=1)

-0%

Idle Maximum * (Watt)

2.3

2.13

7%

2.04

11%

1.28

44%

1.9

17%

2.3 ?(n=1)

-0%

Load Average * (Watt)

4.62

6.19

-34%

5.99

-30%

4

13%

4.62 ?(n=1)

-0%

Load Maximum * (Watt)

8.73

13.67

-57%

10.53

-21%

7.4

15%

8.73 ?(n=1)

-0%

* ... smaller is better

In our Wi-Fi Web browsing battery test, the Redmi phone achieves an impressive runtime of almost 30 hours.

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 151) 29h 9min
Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G
8340 mAh

29.2 h

Nothing Phone (4a)
5080 mAh

18 h

Samsung Galaxy A57
5000 mAh

14.9 h

Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro
6500 mAh

19.4 h

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
6580 mAh

30.5 h

With its durability, bright OLED screen and excellent battery life, the Redmi Note 17 Pro will certainly find its fans. However, major shortcomings in performance and camera quality prevent us from recommending the Xiaomi phone in the mid-range price segment.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G - 10/02/2026 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis

87%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 90%

Pointing Device

91%

Connectivity

43 / 69 → 62%

Weight

88 / 50-100 → 75%

Battery

95%

Display

90%

Games Performance

12 / 55 → 21%

Application Performance

62 / 85 → 73%

AI Performance

10%

Temperature

86%

Noise

100%

Audio

75 / 90 → 83%

Camera

67%

Average

64%

77%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
25%

Packaging
75%

Power Use
93.6%

Repairability
52%

Software Updates
78%

Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 53.9%

Image

Model / Review

Price

Weight

Drive

Display

1.

76.7%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 710 ⎘
6 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 3.1
List Price: 480€223 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.83"
2772x1280
447 PPI
OLED

2.

78.6%

Nothing Phone (4a)

Nothing Phone (4a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 810 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 3.1
List Price: 429€204.5 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.78"
2720x1224
440 PPI
AMOLED

3.

81.5%

Samsung Galaxy A57

Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680 ⎘
Samsung Xclipse 550 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 3.1
List Price: 589€179 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"
2340x1080
385 PPI
Super AMOLED

4.

83.8%

Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro

Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8500 ⎘
ARM Mali-G720 MP8 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x
Amazon: $349.99
List Price: 400€
202 g512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash6.59"
2756x1268
460 PPI
AMOLED

5.

77.6%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra ⎘
ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.2
List Price: 400€210 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.83"
2772x1280
447 PPI
AMOLED
Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Marcus Herbrich

I have always been very passionately interested in mobile technologies, especially smartphones. Being a tech enthusiast means the half-life of my devices isn’t exactly long, and being the latest hardware is not enough to suffice as the manufacturer and operating system play a minor role – the most important aspect for me is that the device is state-of-the-art. After posting for Mobi Test I joined Notebookcheck in 2016, where I have been pursuing my enthusiasm for technology by reviewing the latest smartphone, tablet, and accessory trends.

DeepL / Ninh Duy

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 862694 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

My main responsibility as an editorial assistant is maintaining the Library section, which aggregates reviews from other publications and channels. In addition, my daily breakfast is Notebookcheck's long list of new content, which I comb through to select the most interesting topics for translation from English to French, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, and Dutch."

Marcus Herbrich, 2026-10- 6 (Update: 2026-10- 6)

Схожие новости

#Наименование новостиТональностьИнформативностьДата публикации
1El teléfono de Xiaomi, con una súper batería que llega a los tres días, ahora cuesta menos de 300 euros020.7525-09-2026
2REDMI Note 17 Pro Max 5G review: The 10,000mAh marathon champ07.8815-09-2026
3Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro im Test: Akku-Wunder mit Tempo-Schwäche016.3301-10-2026
4🔥 В НАЛИЧИИ! Xiaomi 17T — новый стандарт автономности и ...013.4629-09-2026
5REDMI Note 17 Series arrives in PH, led by 10,000mAh Pro Max 5G010.5515-09-2026
6 The iQOO 16 raises the bar with a 165Hz display and 8,400mAh cell 010.9730-09-2026
7Обзор REDMI Note 17 Pro Max 5G: смартфон, который покупают надолго031.0123-09-2026
8Redmi Note 17 Pro Max Review | Only a few standout strengths to its name010.9430-09-2026
9В Россию завезли новые смартфоны REDMI Note 17 Pro с 5G, и у них гигантские батареи по крутой цене09.4429-09-2026
10Poco F9 Ultra Review: Exceptional battery life meets powerful sound08.4101-10-2026

Классификация: Мнения. Схожих патентов: 0. Схожих новостей: 10. Тональность: 0. Информативность: 12.66. Источник: www.notebookcheck.net.