Añel, J. A.: The Importance of Reviewing the Code, Communication of the ACM, 54, 40–41, https://doi.org/10.1145/1941487.1941502, 2011. a

Añel, J. A.: Comment on “Most computational hydrology is not reproducible, so is it really science?” by Hutton et al., Water Resour. Res., 53, 2572–2574, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR020190, 2017. a

Añel, J. A.: Reflections on the Scientific Method at the beginning of the twenty-first century, Contemp. Phys., 1, 60–62, https://doi.org/10.1080/00107514.2019.1579863, 2019. a

Añel, J. A., Montes, D. P., and Rodeiro Iglesias, J.: Cloud and Serverless Computing for Scientists, Springer, ISBN 978-3-03-041783-3, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41784-0, 2020. a, b

Añel, J. A., García-Rodríguez, M., and Rodeiro, J.: Current status on the need for improved accessibility to climate models code, Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 923–934, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-923-2021, 2021. a, b, c, d, e

Allison, D., Shiffrin, R., and Stodden, V.: Reproducibility of research: Issues and proposed remedies, P. Natl. Acad. Sci., 115, 2561–2562, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1802324115, 2018. a, b

Arvanitou, E.-M., Ampatzoglou, A., Chatzigeorgiou, A., and Carver, J. C.: Software engineering practices for scientific software development: A systematic mapping study, J. Syst. Softw., 172, 110848, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2020.110848, 2021. a

Association for Computing Machinery: Artifact Review and Badging, https://www.acm.org/publications/policies/artifact-review-and-badging-current (last access: 31 May 2024), 2020. a, b

Backus, J.: The history of Fortran I, II, and III, 25–74, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, ISBN 0127450408, https://doi.org/10.1145/800025.1198345, 1978. a

Baxter, S. M., Day, S. W., Fetrow, J. S., and Reisinger, S. J.: Scientific Software Development Is Not an Oxymoron, PLOS Comput. Biol., 2, 1–4, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020087, 2006. a

Boehm, B. W.: A Spiral Model of Software Development and Enhancement, ACM SIGSOFT, 11, 14–24, https://doi.org/10.1145/358886.358895, 1986. a

Boulanger, A.: Open-source versus proprietary software: Is one more reliable and secure than other?, IBM Syst. J., 1, 239–248, https://doi.org/10.1147/sj.442.0239, 2005.  a

Carlson, D., Eyring, V., van der Wel, N., and Langendijk, G.: WCRP's Coupled Model Intercomparison Project: A Remarkable Contribution to Climate Science, https://www.wcrp-climate.org/images/modelling/WGCM/CMIP/CMIP6FinalDesign_GMD_180329.pdf (last access: 31 May 2024), 2018. a

CMIP: Coupled Model Intercomparison Project, http://cmip-pcmdi.llnl.gov/ (last access: 31 May 2024), 2025a. a

CMIP: History of CMIP, https://pcmdi.llnl.gov/mips/cmip5/history.html (last access: 31 May 2024), 2025b. a

Costa, L., Barbosa, S., and Cunha, J.: Evaluating Tools for Enhancing Reproducibility in Computational Scientific Experiments, in: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Conference on Reproducibility and Replicability, ACM REP '24, 46–51, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, ISBN 9798400705304, https://doi.org/10.1145/3641525.3663623, 2024. a

DoD CIO: Clarifying Guidance Regarding Open Source Software (OSS), Tech. rep., 6 pp., https://dodcio.defense.gov/Portals/0/Documents/FOSS/2009OSS.pdf (last access: 14 April 2024), 2009. a

Drake, J. B.: Climate Modeling for Scientists and Engineers, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, ISBN 978-0898714778, 2001. a

Durack, P. J., Taylor, K. E., Gleckler, P. J., Meehl, G. A., Lawrence, B. N., Covey, C., Stouffer, R. J., Levavasseur, G., Ben-Nasser, A., Denvil, S., Stockhause, M., Gregory, J. M., Juckes, M., Ames, S. K., Antonio, F., Bader, D. C., Dunne, J. P., Ellis, D., Eyring, V., Fiore, S. L., Joussaume, S., Kershaw, P., Lamarque, J.-F., Lautenschlager, M., Lee, J., Mauzey, C. F., Mizielinski, M., Nassisi, P., Nuzzo, A., O’Rourke, E., Painter, J., Potter, G. L., Rodriguez, S., and Williams, D. N.: The Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP): Reviewing project history, evolution, infrastructure and implementation, EGUsphere [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3729, 2025. a

Easterbrook, S. M.: Getting the source code for climate models, https://www.easterbrook.ca/steve/2009/06/getting-the-source-code-for-climate-models (last access: 31 May 2024), 2009. a

Easterbrook, S. M.: Climate Change: A Grand Software Challenge, in: Proceedings of the FSE/SDP Workshop on Future of Software Engineering Research, FoSER '10, 99–104, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, ISBN 9781450304276, https://doi.org/10.1145/1882362.1882383, 2010. a

Righi, M., Andela, B., Eyring, V., Lauer, A., Predoi, V., Schlund, M., Vegas-Regidor, J., Bock, L., Brötz, B., de Mora, L., Diblen, F., Dreyer, L., Drost, N., Earnshaw, P., Hassler, B., Koldunov, N., Little, B., Loosveldt Tomas, S., and Zimmermann, K.: Earth System Model Evaluation Tool (ESMValTool) v2.0 – technical overview, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 1179–1199, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1179-2020, 2020. a

Fenton, N. E. and Bieman, J.: Software Metrics: A Rigorous and Practical Approach, CRC Press, https://doi.org/10.1201/b17461, 2014. a

García-Rodríguez, M.: FortranAnalyser, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5942943, 2022. a, b

García-Rodríguez, M., Añel, J. A., and Rodeiro-Iglesias, J.: Assessing and improving the quality of Fortran code in scientific software: FortranAnalyser, Software Impacts, 21, 100692, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpa.2024.100692, 2024. a, b, c

García-Rodríguez, M., Añel, J. A., and Rodeiro-Iglesias, J.: Source code and analysis results for CESM1 CMIP6 model, Zenodo [code, data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16933339, 2025a. a

García-Rodríguez, M., Añel, J. A., and Rodeiro-Iglesias, J.: Source code and analysis results for CFSv2 CMIP5 model, Zenodo [code, data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16932623, 2025b. a

García-Rodríguez, M., Añel, J. A., and Rodeiro-Iglesias, J.: Source code and analysis results for GEOS-5 CMIP5 model, Zenodo [code, data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16932661, 2025c. a

García-Rodríguez, M., Añel, J. A., and Rodeiro-Iglesias, J.: Source code and analysis results for GFDL CMIP5 model, Zenodo [code, data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16932683, 2025d. a

García-Rodríguez, M., Añel, J. A., and Rodeiro-Iglesias, J.: Source code and analysis results for GISS CMIP5 model, Zenodo [code, data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16932705, 2025e. a

García-Rodríguez, M., Añel, J. A., and Rodeiro-Iglesias, J.: Source code and analysis results for GISS CMIP6 model, Zenodo [code, data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16933370, 2025f. a

García-Rodríguez, M., Añel, J. A., and Rodeiro-Iglesias, J.: Source code and analysis results for HiRAM CMIP6 model, Zenodo [code, data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16932804, 2025g. a

García-Rodríguez, M., Añel, J. A., and Rodeiro-Iglesias, J.: Source code and analysis results for IPSL CMIP5 model, Zenodo [code, data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16932753, 2025h. a

García-Rodríguez, M., Añel, J. A., and Rodeiro-Iglesias, J.: Source code and analysis results for IPSL CMIP6 model, Zenodo [code, data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16933458, 2025i. a

Gardner, J. and GitHub staff: Linguist: Language Savvy, GitHub, https://github.com/github/linguist (last access: 31 May 2024), 2024. a

GMD Executive Editors: Editorial: The publication of geoscientific model developments v1.1, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 3487–3495, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3487-2015, 2015. a

Hunter-Zinck, H., de Siqueira, A. F., Vásquez, V. N., Barnes, R., and Martinez, C. C.: Ten simple rules on writing clean and reliable open-source scientific software, PLOS Comput. Biol., 17, 1–9, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009481, 2021. a

Kanewala, U. and Bieman, J. M.: Testing scientific software: A systematic literature review, Inform. Software Tech., 56, 1219–1232, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2014.05.006, 2014. a, b

Kernighan, B. W. and Ritchie, D. M.: The C Programming Language, Prentice Hall, ISBN 978-0131103627, 1988. a

Knutti, R., Masson, D., and Gettelman, A.: Climate model genealogy: Generation CMIP5 and how we got there, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 1194–1199, https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50256, 2013. a

Matthes, E.: Python Crash Course, No Starch Press, ISBN 978-1593279288, 2019. a

McCall, J., Richards, P., and Walters, G.: Factors in Software Quality, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Software Engineering, 2, 155–160, 1977. a

McConnell, S.: Code Complete, Microsoft Press, ISBN 978-0-7356-1967-8, 2004. a

Metcalf, M., Reid, J., and Cohen, M.: Modern Fortran Explained, Oxford University Press, numerical recipes in fortran 90th edn., ISBN 978-0199601424, 2011. a

Moore, G. E.: Cramming more components onto integrated circuits, McGraw-Hill, 38th edn., https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.1998.658762, 1965. a

Nature: Does your code stand up to scrutiny?, Nature, 555, https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-02741-4, 2018. a

Nguyen-Hoan, L., Flint, S., and Sankaranarayana, R.: A Survey of Scientific Software Development, in: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, ESEM '10, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, ISBN 9781450300391, https://doi.org/10.1145/1852786.1852802, 2010. a

Perkel, J. M.: Containers in the Cloud, Nature, SIAM News, 1, 247–248, https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-03366-x, 2019. a

Pipitone, J. and Easterbrook, S.: Assessing climate model software quality: a defect density analysis of three models, Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 1009–1022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-1009-2012, 2012. a

Pressman, R. S.: Software Engineering: A Practitioner's Approach, McGraw-Hill, ISBN 978-0073375977, 2005. a

RealClimate.org: Sources of code and data related to climate science, http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/data-sources (last access: 31 May 2024), 2009. a

Riesch, M., Nguyen, T. D., and Jirauschek, C.: bertha: Project skeleton for scientific software, PLOS ONE, 15, 1–12, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230557, 2020. a

Seibel, P.: Practical Common Lisp, Apress, Berkeley, CA, ISBN 978-1-59059-239-7, 2005. a

Stodden, V., Guo, P., and Ma, Z.: Toward Reproducible Computational Research: An Empirical Analysis of Data and Code Policy Adoption by Journals, PLoS ONE, 8, e67111, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067111, 2013. a

Stodden, V., Seiler, J., and Ma, Z.: An empirical analysis of journal policy effectiveness for computational reproducibility, P. Natl. Acad. Sci., 115, 2584–2589, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708290115, 2018. a, b

Stouffer, R., Eyring, V., Meehl, G., Bony, S., Senior, C., Stevens, B., and Taylor, K.: CMIP5 Scientific Gaps and Recommendations for CMIP6, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 98, 95–105, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00013.1, 2017.  a

Stroustrup, B.: The C++ Programming Language, Addison-Wesley, 4th edn., ISBN 978-0321563842, 2013. a

Trisovic, A., Lau, M. K., Pasquier, T., Crosas, M., and Broman, K. W.: A large-scale study on research code quality and execution, Sci. Data, 9, 60, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01143-6, 2022. a

U.S. Code: 17 U.S. Code § Section 105. Subject matter of copyright: United States Government works, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/105 (last access: 3 August 2026), 1976. a

van Wendel de Joode, R., de Bruijn, J. A., and van Eeten, M. J. G.: Protecting the Virtual Commons, T.M.C. Asser Press, ISBN 978-90-6704-159-1, 2003. a

Wieters, N. and Fritzsch, B.: Opportunities and limitations of software project management in geoscience and climate modelling, Adv. Geosci., 45, 383–387, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-45-383-2018, 2018. a

Wilson, G., Aruliah, D. A., Brown, C. T., Chue Hong, N. P., Davis, M., Guy, R. T., Haddock, S. H. D., Huff, K. D., Mitchell, I. M., Plumbley, M. D., Waugh, B., White, E. P., and Wilson, P.: Best Practices for Scientific Computing, PLOS Biol., 12, 1–7, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001745, 2014. a

Wilson, G., Bryan, J., Cranston, K., Kitzes, J., Nederbragt, L., and Teal, T.: Good enough practices in scientific computing, PLOS Comput. Biol., 13, e1005510, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005510, 2017. a

Wu, C., Chakravorti, T., Carroll, J. M., and Rajtmajer, S.: Integrating measures of replicability into scholarly search: Challenges and opportunities, in: Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '24, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, ISBN 9798400703300, https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3643043, 2024. a

Zaporozhets, D.: GitLab, https://about.gitlab.com/ (last access: 31 May 2024), 2011. a