Вход на сайт

Просмотр новости

Найдите то, что Вас интересует

Bombay HC seeks Maharashtra govt. reply on Malegaon Deputy Mayor's plea against removing Tipu portrait from her office

Дата публикации: 18-09-2026 00:24:11

Nilesh Kakade, the Leader of the Opposition Shiv Sena (Eknath Shinde) party in the Malegaon Municipal Corporation, complained about the particular portrait of Tipu Sultan in the office building of the corporation, the petition states

Основное содержимое страницы с новостью.

A Bench of Chief Justice Mahesh Chandra Tripathi and Justice Advait Sethna heard the petition and adjourned the matter, granting the State time to file its reply. File

A Bench of Chief Justice Mahesh Chandra Tripathi and Justice Advait Sethna heard the petition and adjourned the matter, granting the State time to file its reply. File

The Bombay High Court on Thursday (September 17, 2026) asked the Maharashtra government to file a reply to a petition by Deputy Mayor of Malegaon Municipal Corporation Shaan e Hind Nihal Ahmed against communications from the Maharashtra Police to remove a portrait of Tipu Sultan from her office.

A Bench of Chief Justice Mahesh Chandra Tripathi and Justice Advait Sethna heard the petition and adjourned the matter, granting the State time to file its reply.

The petition states that Ms. Ahmed, of the Samajwadi Party, displayed portraits of several national leaders in her office, including those of Shivaji Maharaj, Mahatma Gandhi, Rani Laxmibai, Tipu Sultan, Subhash Chandra Bose, Fatima Shaikh, Savitribai Phule, Babasaheb Ambedkar, Abdul Kalam Azad, Bhagat Singh, Jyotiba Phule and Shahu Maharaj.

Nilesh Kakade, the Leader of the Opposition Shiv Sena (Eknath Shinde) party in the Malegaon Municipal Corporation, complained about the particular portrait of Tipu Sultan in the office building of the corporation, the petition states.

The petition refers to a circular from September 1965 and Government Resolutions which says that portraits of leaders of the country could be displayed in premises of the government, according to the petition.

Ms. Ahmed moved the court through counsel M.M. Vashi, who argued that the circulars and Government Resolutions cited by the respondents do not name figures such as Abdul Kalam Azad, Fatima Shaikh and Bhagat Singh. He said the respondents object only to the portrait of Tipu Sultan.

Mr. Vashi further said the court in Nashik has a portrait of Tipu Sultan and no action has been taken.

Published - September 18, 2026 05:54 am IST

Схожие новости

#Наименование новостиТональностьИнформативностьДата публикации
1Bombay High Court seeks response from State, Bar Council on stipend for junior advocates07.3508-08-2026
2Bombay HC Judge recuses from hearing challenge to Maharashtra Special Public Security Act08.3711-08-2026
3Bombay High Court to begin hearing on Maratha Quota Act from October 9010.418-09-2026
4Maharashtra SIR: 30% electorate likely to be disenfranchised, says Congress014.0122-09-2026
5Calcutta High Court to hear TMC Mamata Banerjee-led faction's petition for permission for rally on July 150513-07-2026
6Shiv Sena dispute: Supreme Court calls for clear criteria to determine 'real' party when factions stake claim07.6606-08-2026
7‘I have never met or known Disha Salian,’ says Aaditya Thackeray011.7217-09-2026
8NDA delegation petitions Gyanesh Kumar seeking EC intervention over SIR ‘irregularities’ in Karnataka0507-07-2026
9Netanyahu's comptroller pick represents ruling Likud party in legal fight over his election07.1329-07-2026
10Кандидат в мэры Новосибирска вновь обжаловал отказ снять с выборов действующего главу0003-09-2019

Классификация: . Схожих патентов: 0. Схожих новостей: 10. Тональность: 0. Информативность: 5.41. Источник: www.thehindu.com.