Вход на сайт

Просмотр новости

Найдите то, что Вас интересует

Weber v. City of Allentown

Дата публикации: 10-07-2026 17:30:14

The news outlet seeks records that could shed light on how police use license plate reader data.
The post Weber v. City of Allentown appeared first on The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press.


Основное содержимое страницы с новостью.

Case Number: 2026-C-2695

Court: Lehigh County Court of Common Pleas

Clients: Lindsay Weber and The Morning Call

Background: In April 2026, The Morning Call reporter Lindsay Weber filed a request under Pennsylvania’s Right-to-Know Law seeking, among other records, all aggregated data showing the Allentown Police Department’s searches on its Flock Safety License Plate Reader systems, including the dates and reasons for the search.

According to The Morning Call, Allentown has 67 Flock Safety automatic license plate readers that “instantly capture detailed data about license plates and vehicles, and automatically alert police when a stolen or wanted car passes by.” Across the country, critics have raised privacy concerns about Flock cameras, citing cases of law enforcement officers using their access to the Flock system to stalk people, such as their ex-partners. 

The City of Allentown denied Weber’s request, claiming the data contains criminal investigative information that’s exempt from disclosure under the RTKL. Weber and The Morning Call appealed to the district attorney’s office, which affirmed the city’s denial.

On behalf of Weber and The Morning Call, Paula Knudsen Burke, the Reporters Committee’s Pennsylvania-based attorney, and attorney Jim Davy of All Rise Trial & Appellate filed this appeal of the DA appeals officer’s determination. In the filings, Burke and Davy argue that the city failed to prove that the requested records contain investigative information. And the RTKL makes clear that the exemption for investigative information doesn’t apply to aggregated data, the appeal adds, asking the Lehigh County Court of Common Pleas to order the release of the data. 

Quote: “The public deserves to have a better understanding of how this new and rapidly evolving technology, which has raised privacy concerns, is being used locally,” said Morning Call Editor John Misinco in an an article about the lawsuit. “Getting access to the records we are seeking should help provide a clearer picture.”

Co-counsel: Jim Davy of All Rise Trial & Appellate

Filings:

2026-07-10: Petition for review

Схожие новости

#Наименование новостиТональностьИнформативностьДата публикации
1Melamed v. City of Philadelphia Police Department05.8308-06-2026
2Man sues Wichita over Flock cameras, says he's 'trapped' in unconstitutional 'dragnet'07.4231-07-2026
3Data Capture Alone Doesn't Violate Calif. License Plate Law06.921-07-2026
4Sarkes Tarzian v. U.S. Department of Justice010.4120-08-2026
5RCFP urges federal district court in Pennsylvania to lift restrictions on accessing immigration records05.6218-02-2026
6Multiple Valley departments investigate whether officers misused Flock license plate reader system06.9412-08-2026
7In re application of The New York Times & Reporters Committee to unseal judicial records ancillary to grand jury subpoena of Matthew Cole03.3519-08-2026
8In re: Petitions to seal coroner’s files of Lori Wasko, Dennis Seelenbrandt, and Carmine Faino05.4908-06-2026
9RCFP seeks to unseal court records related to FBI search of Washington Post reporter’s home04.9715-01-2026
10Columbus police respond to Flock camera debate0515-07-2026

Классификация: Происшествия. Схожих патентов: 0. Схожих новостей: 10. Тональность: 0. Информативность: 8.93. Источник: www.rcfp.org.