There are exceptions (like electing a misguided fascist, if not wannabe fascist as the current super unpopular president of our country), but I think it's very interesting that in our society we give great authority to the (principled) decisions of doctors and judges, and this story (of non-scientific industry influence & political corruption) includes both!
I would give much less credibility/respect if the judge decides against the physician group.

![]()
The lawsuit alleges the Trump administration violated federal law with a ‘secret panel’ when it established the latest guidelines.
August 19, 2026
August 19, 2026 – A physicians group is asking a federal court to order the Trump administration to withdraw its Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGA), arguing it violated federal law by relying on a “secret panel” for scientific evidence.
Expand your understanding of food systems as a Civil Eats member. Enjoy unlimited access to our groundbreaking reporting, engage with experts, and connect with a community of changemakers.
Already a member?
Login
The Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, a nonprofit organization that supports plant-based diets, filed a lawsuit Wednesday in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, challenging the legality of the latest dietary guidelines.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) are tasked with co-writing the guidelines every five years. The latest iteration was published under the Trump administration in January this year, along with a new, inverted food pyramid.
The DGA process is complex. The final guidelines are supported by recommendations and a scientific report completed by an independent advisory committee.
For the latest version, the original advisory committee met over the course of two years, concluding its work before the end of the Biden administration. Their scientific report prioritized plant-based proteins over animal products.
However, the latest DGAs emphasize animal proteins and dairy products, contradicting many of the recommendations in the advisory committee’s report. Instead, the DGAs were backed by a separate report, completed by a panel of researchers with ties to the beef and dairy industries. Unlike the original committee, this second panel’s work was not open to the public.
The lawsuit argues that HHS and the USDA violated the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) by relying on this second panel for scientific evidence. The law was created to limit industry and special interest influence in federal advisory committees, and it sets parameters for transparency, like requiring meetings to be open to the public.
“The government allowed the meat and dairy industries to ghostwrite the Dietary Guidelines,” Neal Barnard, president of the Physicians Committee, said in a press release. “They put money in industry’s pocket and cholesterol in Americans’ arteries.”
The physician group has asked the court to require agencies to share documents and minutes related to the second panel’s work. It also asks the court to order the withdrawal of the current DGAs and prevent agencies from relying on these guidelines in future decisions.
Already, the administration has used the DGAs as the basis for more informal action, like a voluntary pledge for hospitals and schools to implement the guidelines in meals. But the USDA is also in the process of crafting new school meal nutrition standards based on the guidelines.
This is not the first time the physicians group has sued over dietary guidelines. In 2023, a federal judge dismissed the group’s lawsuit over the 2020 DGAs for a lack of standing. (Link to this post.)
Civil Eats is a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, and we count on our supporters to keep producing our award-winning work.
Readers like you are the reason why we’re able to keep digging deep into stories you won’t find anywhere else. When you become a supporter, your contributions directly fund our journalism—from paying our reporters to keeping the internet on in our remote offices across the United States.
Your support will also come with great benefits, including our award-winning newsletter, The Deep Dish, which is full of relevant and timely reporting, access to our Slack community, and online salons as a way to engage with reporters, food and agriculture experts, and each other.
Rebekah Alvey is a staff reporter for Civil Eats. Read more >
| # | Наименование новости | Тональность | Информативность | Дата публикации |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Legal System Is Not Reining in Trump. It’s Letting Him Bend Law to His Will. | -8 | 6 | 05-01-2026 |
| 2 | Comment on Op-ed: Worried About an Outbreak? Try a Shorter Food Supply Chain. by Keshav | 0 | 12.56 | 20-08-2026 |
| 3 | The Supreme Court is handing Donald Trump more power | 0 | 7 | 10-12-2025 |
| 4 | The Trump court? Not quite | 0 | 7 | 26-02-2026 |
| 5 | Donald Trump’s revenge agenda is not going well | -2 | 6 | 26-11-2025 |
| 6 | Combatting Centralized Control Over Government Science | 0 | 7.47 | 30-07-2026 |
| 7 | The Small-C Constitutional Problem with <i>Trump v. Slaughter</i> | 0 | 13.78 | 07-08-2026 |
| 8 | Trump Attacks Justices as “Unpatriotic and Disloyal” After Tariffs Ruling | -5 | 5 | 20-02-2026 |
| 9 | Comment on ‘My Shelves Are Very Empty’: How a Year of SNAP Cuts Is Pressuring the Food System by So pissed for the kids, elders, caregivers, and more | 0 | 9.11 | 23-07-2026 |
| 10 | ‘King Trump’ is stronger than ever after US supreme court bolsters his agenda | -2 | 6 | 02-07-2026 |