Вход на сайт

Просмотр новости

Найдите то, что Вас интересует

Cashew import scam: High Court allows pleas against reconsideration of prosecution sanction

Дата публикации: 18-08-2026 16:24:02

Division Bench finds merit in former KSCDC officials’ contention that they were not given an opportunity to be heard before sanction was ordered to be reconsidered

Основное содержимое страницы с новостью.

A Single Bench of the court, while considering a contempt of court petition filed by Kadakampally Manoj of Kollam, had ordered the State to reconsider the sanction to prosecute the two former officials of KSCDC.

A Single Bench of the court, while considering a contempt of court petition filed by Kadakampally Manoj of Kollam, had ordered the State to reconsider the sanction to prosecute the two former officials of KSCDC.

The Kerala High Court has allowed the petitions filed by INTUC State president and former Kerala State Cashew Development Corporation (KSCDC) chairperson R. Chandrasekharan and former managing director K.A. Ratheesh challenging a court order directing the State to reconsider sanction for their prosecution in connection with the cashew import scam allegations.

The Division Bench of Justice K. Natarajan and Justice Johnson John allowed the petitions by Mr. Ratheesh and Mr. Chandrasekhar, finding merit in their contention that the court had set aside the State’s refusal of sanction and directed reconsideration without giving the petitioners an opportunity to be heard.

A Single Bench of the court, while considering a contempt of court petition by Kadakampally Manoj of Kollam, had ordered the State to reconsider the sanction to prosecute the two former officials of KSCDC. The sanction had been refused thrice before being granted to the Central Bureau of Investigation on July 6.

The Division Bench noted that separate challenges had been made to each order directing the State to reconsider sanction in accordance with the observations made by the court in a previous order. After the grant of sanction, the CBI had informed the court that offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, had been added to the chargesheet against the accused, in addition to charges of cheating and criminal conspiracy under the Indian Penal Code.

The CBI had sought sanction to prosecute the public officials in the investigation into the alleged misappropriation in the import of raw cashew by the Corporation between 2006 and 2015.

Published - August 18, 2026 09:53 pm IST

Схожие новости

#Наименование новостиТональностьИнформативностьДата публикации
1Assembly ruckus case: Kerala High Court quashes complaint against former Congress MLA A.T. George07.2818-08-2026
2Court Setback for Lesotho Highlands Dam Compensation Claims07.908-07-2026
3Educationist Ishari K. Ganesh withdraws plea in Madras High Court to quash money laundering case0513-07-2026
4Malaysia: Landmark Ruling Upholds COO's Dismissal01030-07-2026
5Bombay High Court interprets Supreme Court order on law exam protection08.7313-08-2026
6Kerala High Court slams Home department for double standards in action against officials07.9417-08-2026
7Источник: в СК не согласны с решением вернуть дело двух генералов МВД на доследование0020-05-2021
8Delhi High Court dismisses plea seeking review of Parliament security framework05.0406-08-2026
9Right of Way: The right to walk safely demands more than urban design standards for demarcated pavements0513-07-2026
10Дело о госперевороте в Кыргызстане: 5 фигурантов остались под стражей014.7620-05-2026

Классификация: Происшествия. Схожих патентов: 0. Схожих новостей: 10. Тональность: 0. Информативность: 8.48. Источник: www.thehindu.com.