Вход на сайт

Просмотр новости

Найдите то, что Вас интересует

Trump lawyer urges Supreme Court to allow order targeting mail-in voting before midterms

Дата публикации: 27-07-2026 21:10:24

Lawyers for California and 22 other Democratic-led states sued, arguing that the states, not the federal government, have the constitutional authority to set the rules for voting and elections.

Основное содержимое страницы с новостью.

WASHINGTON — The Trump administration urged the Supreme Court on Monday to lift a judge’s order and clear the way for state-by-state lists of citizens who are eligible to vote by mail.

Solicitor Gen. D. John Sauer filed an emergency appeal and said judges in Boston had wrongly intervened too soon.

In March, President Trump ordered the U.S. Postal Service to direct states to compile a list of citizens who are eligible to vote. The list would limit who could receive a mail ballot.

He also ordered the Department of Homeland Security to “compile and transmit state-specific lists of individuals who are citizens and will be 18 years of age or older at the time of an upcoming election,” Sauer said.

Lawyers for California and 22 other Democratic-led states sued, arguing the states, not the federal government, have the constitutional authority to set the rules for voting and elections.

In June, they won before a federal judge in Boston who blocked Trump’s order from going forward, at least in the 23 states that had sued. Her decision was upheld over the weekend by the 1st Circuit Court of Appeals.

In his appeal, Trump’s solicitor general focused on a procedural question, not the issue of whether the president has the legal authority to impose national rules on state-run elections.

Sauer said the U.S. Postal Service and the Department of Homeland Security had not issued final specific plans to comply with Trump’s directive.

“Courts cannot enjoin implementation of Executive Orders that leave open material issues that still need to be resolved by agencies,” he wrote.

He asked the court to lift or stay the “premature injunctions.”

Time is running short, he said.

“Absent a stay ... there will not be sufficient time to obtain appellate relief before the November election,” Sauer said. “That is especially true because implementation efforts for any USPS rule or DHS policy will need to begin well before November ... particularly given that absentee and mail-in voting begin (in some States) several weeks prior to Election Day.”

The justices asked for a response from the 23 Democratic states by Aug. 3.

More to Read

Схожие новости

#Наименование новостиТональностьИнформативностьДата публикации
1Democratic state officials urge US Supreme Court to affirm pause on Trump vote-by-mail order010.4204-08-2026
2Democratic states urge Supreme Court to block Trump's new limits on mail ballots011.5403-08-2026
3Trump administration, states urge justices to allow full implementation of executive order on mail-in voting016.6727-07-2026
4Trump administration urges Supreme Court to rule soon on limiting vote-by-mail in midterms07.112-08-2026
5President Trump's crusade against mail-in voting loses in federal court010.4125-07-2026
6President Trump's crusade against mail-in voting loses in federal court010.4125-07-2026
7President Trump's crusade against mail-in voting loses in federal court010.4125-07-2026
8States challenging executive order on mail-in voting ask justices to leave in place limits on its implementation014.3903-08-2026
9Oregon and California can continue to accept late-arriving ballots under Supreme Court ruling0529-06-2026

Классификация: Международные. Схожих патентов: 0. Схожих новостей: 9. Тональность: 0. Информативность: 12.34. Источник: www.latimes.com.