Вход на сайт

Просмотр новости

Найдите то, что Вас интересует

xAI v. Bonta

Дата публикации: 22-07-2026 07:00:00

On July 22, 2026, the Knight Institute filed an amicus brief in xAI LLC v. Bonta, a case concerning a California law requiring developers of generative AI systems to disclose information about the data they use to train their models.
The Institute’s amicus brief argues that the public needs greater transparency into the generative AI systems that are fast becoming part of our online lives. The large technology companies that develop these systems gatekeep information about how they are built, how they operate, and how they impact our information ecosystem. Transparency laws can disrupt these information monopolies and empower users to make informed decisions as both consumers and citizens.
The Institute’s brief further argues that transparency laws that facilitate the free flow of accurate information about commercial products or services should be subject to a relaxed standard of review under the First Amendment. Under that standard, the brief argues, xAI has not shown that California’s generative AI transparency law violates the First Amendment because the law advances the state’s interest in informing users about generative AI systems and does not appear to impose an undue burden on xAI’s speech. 
Status: Briefing ongoing.
Case Information: x.AI LLC v. Bonta, No. 26-1591 (9th Cir.).

Основное содержимое страницы с новостью.

Amicus Brief

A Ninth Circuit case challenging California’s generative AI transparency law

On July 22, 2026, the Knight Institute filed an amicus brief in xAI LLC v. Bonta, a case concerning a California law requiring developers of generative AI systems to disclose information about the data they use to train their models.

The Institute’s amicus brief argues that the public needs greater transparency into the generative AI systems that are fast becoming part of our online lives. The large technology companies that develop these systems gatekeep information about how they are built, how they operate, and how they impact our information ecosystem. Transparency laws can disrupt these information monopolies and empower users to make informed decisions as both consumers and citizens.

The Institute’s brief further argues that transparency laws that facilitate the free flow of accurate information about commercial products or services should be subject to a relaxed standard of review under the First Amendment. Under that standard, the brief argues, xAI has not shown that California’s generative AI transparency law violates the First Amendment because the law advances the state’s interest in informing users about generative AI systems and does not appear to impose an undue burden on xAI’s speech. 

Status: Briefing ongoing.

Case Information: x.AI LLC v. Bonta, No. 26-1591 (9th Cir.).

Press Statements Legal Filings

Click to highlight response chains

Схожие новости

#Наименование новостиТональностьИнформативностьДата публикации
1CAIR Foundation v. DeSantis08.6109-07-2026
2По итогам года у нас будет 10 тысяч школ с инклюзивным образованием – Васильева0010-12-2018
3Багаевская: Ночь 18 дек, Вт0017-12-2018
4Спрос на перевозки из Китая и Казахстана в Беларусь вырос в 3 раза0028-01-2025
5Продажа от Собственника ! Volkswagen Passat b6 2010 год по ...0025-02-2025
6Гарифуллина поделилась, что каждый концерт для нее как праздник5329-06-2026
7 One Ring to call them all 0002-05-2011
8«Двушки» в готовых минских новостройках: почем их сейчас продают0028-01-2020
9В Орловской области отменили ракетную опасность0528-06-2026
10За кадром любимых советских фильмов0025-05-2019

Классификация: Пресс-релизы. Схожих патентов: 0. Схожих новостей: 10. Тональность: 0. Информативность: 6.46. Источник: knightcolumbia.org.