Michael Burry Sounds the Alarm Again: AI Is a Circular Financing Web With Nvidia In the Middle

Дата публикации: 13-08-2026 14:41:54

Michael Burry is pointing at a $770 billion AI spending wave and asking whether the money circling through hyperscalers, chip makers, and AI labs is creating real value or just the appearance of it.

Основное содержимое страницы с новостью.

Corporate America is expected to pour some $770 billion into AI infrastructure in 2026, and the credit markets are starting to ask a pointed question: whose money is actually paying for it? The Bank for International Settlements addressed exactly that in its late-June Annual Report, warning that hyperscaler debt tied to AI buildouts is growing faster than the balance sheets carrying it. 

That’s the backdrop for Michael Burry’s latest post on X, where the investor who shorted subprime mortgages before the 2008 crash shared a Bloomberg diagram tracing how AI revenue keeps showing up strong even as free cash flow turns negative. His conclusion: the money is circling, not multiplying.

The Circular Financing Loop, Mapped in Dollars

The Bloomberg diagram Burry shared traces roughly $46 billion in direct equity stakes and $879 billion in multi-year purchase commitments moving between Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT | MSFT Price Prediction), Oracle (NYSE:ORCL), Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN), Google, Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:META), OpenAI, Anthropic, xAI, CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV), Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA), and Advanced Micro Devices (NASDAQ:AMD). 

Oracle alone committed $300 billion in purchases tied to OpenAI. Microsoft committed roughly $250 billion of its own. OpenAI then turned around and committed $90 billion to AMD while also taking a direct equity stake in Nvidia.

Nvidia sits dead center of the web at a $5.4 trillion valuation today. Every company on the list has lines running to Nvidia, either as an investor, a customer, or both. That’s not necessarily fraud — Jensen Huang has publicly called the circular financing label “ridiculous” — but it does mean the same dollar can show up as revenue at more than one stop on the chain. 

Anthropic and OpenAI combined are worth roughly $1.8 trillion despite neither being profitable, and both depend on continued hyperscaler funding to keep buying the chips that justify those valuations.

The mechanics are simple, even if the spreadsheet isn’t: a hyperscaler funds an AI lab, the lab spends that money on compute from the hyperscaler, and the hyperscaler books the spending as revenue. Run that loop enough times and top-line growth stops telling you much about actual customer demand.

The Credit Market Is Already Pricing This In

The BIS estimates the five largest hyperscalers are carrying roughly $1.65 trillion in off-balance-sheet debt through special purpose vehicles and off-balance sheet arrangements, exceeding the $1.35 trillion they report directly. 

That gap matters because SPV debt doesn’t show up in the leverage ratios investors typically screen for. It shows up instead in credit default swaps, and Nvidia’s five-year CDS spread has roughly doubled over the past two months, according to data Burry cited in his post.

Not every investor reads this as a red flag. Chris Camillo, the founder and CEO of TickerTags, a social data intelligence company, has argued the circular financing The money loop works fine as long as AI delivers enough actual value to justify the spending — and to be fair, Nvidia still generated close to $48 billion in free cash flow in a recent quarter, real cash, not accounting fiction. 

That’s the counterargument in a nutshell: the vendor financing isn’t automatically a problem if the underlying product keeps selling itself.

Key Takeaway

In short, the concern isn’t that AI companies are lying about revenue — it’s that the revenue is increasingly self-referential, and the debt backing it is increasingly invisible on a standard balance sheet. 

Investors holding Nvidia, Microsoft, or Oracle don’t need to panic-sell on a single post by Burry. But they should watch two numbers going forward: hyperscaler off-balance-sheet debt disclosures in coming 10-Qs, and Nvidia’s CDS spread as a real-time gauge of how credit markets are pricing this risk. 

Ultimately, a portfolio concentrated in one end of this loop is making a bet on the whole web holding together — and that’s a bet worth sizing carefully, not avoiding entirely.

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.

Схожие новости

#	Наименование новости	Тональность	Информативность	Дата публикации
1	Warren Buffett is buying, Michael Burry is shorting: The AI trade splitting Wall Street	0	7	07-12-2025
2	Top AI Reporter: NVIDIA’s $500 Billion AI Compute Deal “Isn’t Even Enough” According to Some Investors	0	8.83	13-08-2026
3	The new maths: AI’s big four, a $720 billion bill, and a future no one knows	0	9.88	04-08-2026
4	Michael Burry doubles down on AI chip bubble with Micron short	0	5	04-07-2026
5	Costly, but AI is not yet a bubble	0	8.1	26-04-2026
6	AI’s $11 trillion compute boom may leave Wall Street holding a $7 trillion debt market	-2	6	06-07-2026
7	AI bubble or boom? Why Warren Buffett called Big Short fame Michael Burry ‘Cassandra’	0	7	03-07-2026
8	Meta, Microsoft roar higher on strong earnings as AI spending booms	7	8	31-07-2025
9	The Perils of Wall St.’s Race to Pour Billions More Into A.I.	0	11.02	11-08-2026
10	Every Tech IPO Cycle Promised to Spread Wealth Around. None of Them Ever Did	0	10.36	24-07-2026

Классификация: Мнения. Схожих патентов: 0. Схожих новостей: 10. Тональность: 0. Информативность: 7.69. Источник: 247wallst.com.